Key Data Set Information | |
Location | EU+EFTA+UK |
Geographical representativeness description | European dataset. Representative data for Europe has been used for the foreground systems, Global and European datasets were used in the background systems. |
Reference year | 2012 |
Name |
Base name
; Treatment, standards, routes
; Mix and location types
; Quantitative product or process properties
Alkyd resin (thixotropic polyurethane); Technology mix; Production mix, at plant; 77% in low aromatic white spirit
|
Use advice for data set | Notice: this data set supersedes the EF3.0-compliant version (see link under "preceding data set version" below calculated with the EF3.0). The life cycle inventory is not changed from the original EF3.0 data set. The LCIA results are calculated based on the EF3.1 methods which provide updated characterisation factors in the following impact categories: Climate Change, Ecotoxicity freshwater, Photochemical Ozone Formation, Acidification, Human Toxicity non-cancer, and Human Toxicity cancer. The review report and the data quality ratings refer to the original results. The data set has been updated by the European Commission on the basis of the original EF3.0 data set delivered by the data provider. |
Technical purpose of product or process | Chemical substance used in the production of decorative coatings |
Complementing processes | |
Classification |
Class name
:
Hierarchy level
|
General comment on data set | The dataset represents the manufacture of raw materials for the paint industry. It is based on the models created for the CEPE Raw Material database, version 3 (European Council of the Paint, Printing Ink and Artists' Colours Industry; limited access), which have been updated with PEF-compliant background sources based on Ecoinvent 3.3 and process-based EF-compliant LCI datasets for energy and transport. The inventory is based on literature and background sources, following general assumptions for the paint industry. Biogenic carbon content 24,8%. Water content 0% |
Copyright | Yes |
Owner of data set | |
Quantitative reference | |
Reference flow(s) | |
Time representativeness | |
Data set valid until | 2024 |
Time representativeness description | Annual average data. No intra-annual or intra-daily differences have been made. Representative data for the year 2012 has been used. Data set valid until end of 2024. |
Technological representativeness | |
Technology description including background system | In the technology description below, specific dataset names refer to the original modelling based on Ecoinvent 3.3. They might have been updated using the names of the equivalent EF-compliant datasets (In particular transport, infrastructure, water, heat, energy and waste datasets). For this RM no specific data was found, therefore, it was modelled based on a modified process from Ecoinvent: “RER: alkyd resin production, long oil, product in 70% white spirit solution state”, however the data set was modified since the mass balance of the original data set was incorrect since it had been calculated for an output of 1.429 kg alkyd and not 1 kg (Ecoinvent Centre, 2016). The inputs were therefore adjusted to 1 kg alkyd output. White spirit was modified to 23 % so that the concentration of the alkyd was 77 % in white spirit. According to Ullmann´s 2012, polyurethane can be added to an alkyd resin, generating thixotropic behaviours. As reported in Kastanek et al. 1991; 5 wt% polyurethane was added to a soya oil based alkyd, hence, in the model, 5 wt% polyurethane was added to the alkyd. Polyurethane was modelled as follows: Polyurethanes are formed from reactions of a polyol and a diisocyanate (Ullmann´s 2012), therefore, this RM was modelled from polytetramethylene ether glycol (polyol) + hydrogenated methylene diisocyanate (HMDI), added in equal amounts (wt%). These amounts were chosen since no information about the actual amounts were found in literature. HDMI was approximated with MDI in the Gabi model. The data set used in the model was: “RER: Polyol production” (Ecoinvent) and for the MDI, “RoW: Methylene diphenyl diisocyanate production” (Ecoinvent). The reaction to produce polyurethane is exothermic, as according to the section on background assumptions (see below), no heat is required but 0.05 MJ/kg electric energy was added in the model. During the mixture of alkyd with polyurethane, 0.05 MJ/kg electric energy and 0.52 MJ/kg heat was added, based on the generic assumptions as described in the background section (see below). Transportation is accounted for in the alkyd resin and polyurethane modelling only. Standard distances of transportation have been used for all of the input materials used to produce a chemical. It has been assumed that all input materials are transported 600 km by train “EU-28+3: Freight train, average (without fuel)” (EF-compliant datasets) and 100 km by truck “EU-28+3: Articulated lorry transport, Total weight 20-26 t, mix Euro 0-5) (EF-compliant datasets). Use of heat If no specific information was available regarding type of heat used for a production process, the process “RER: market for heat, in chemical industry” has been used (Ecoinvent 3.3), for which the background datasets were replaced with EF-compliant datasets from the node. This process consists mainly of heat from combustion of natural gas, but also some fuel oil, hard coal and electricity. To calculate the amount of heat needed in a process, two different approaches were used. Two different assumptions have been made regarding the energy use of chemical reactions, depending on whether the reactions are exothermic or endothermic. The classification of chemical reactions into these two categories is based on standard enthalpy of reaction. The main sources of information regarding standard enthalpies of formation were chemistry literature and textbooks, such as NIST (2012) and Atkins & Jones (2005). For exothermic reactions, it has been assumed that no additional energy is needed to produce the chemical of interest. This is a simplification as some energy input is likely needed to start a reaction and to maintain it through mixing, etc. The energy generated through the exothermic reaction could also be used in other chemical processes, but this has also been assumed to be non-existent due to lack of data from a specific site. For endothermic reactions, two methods have been used; • It has been assumed that the total energy consumption for the production of a chemical is 30% higher than the standard enthalpy of reaction. • To calculate the required heat, heat losses were assumed to be 20%, and the specific heat capacity for the polymer to be 2.5 [kJ/kg·K], a default value based on that of common organic substances. 2.5 kJ/kg·K is a conservative estimate of the overall heat use for a production process step. For all condensation reactions, it is assumed some energy is required for distillation of the water, therefore 2.26 MJ/kg water (specific heat of evaporation for water) is assumed to be necessary. Electricity use If no specific information was available regarding type of electricity used for a production process, the process “EU-28+3: Electricity grid mix 1kV-60kV” has been used (EF-compliant datasets). When no data regarding amount of electricity use was found, a default value of 0.05 MJ electric power/kg product per process step was used for calculations. Process steps can be e.g. mixing or pumping. This value was derived from studying LCA data of different plastics and chemicals and theoretical calculations of energy use. For the entire product chain, values are often between 0.5-2 MJ/kg plastics (incl. different steps and upstream use), making 0.05 MJ/kg a conservative estimate for one process step. |
Flow diagram(s) or picture(s) |
LCI method and allocation | |||||||||||||||||||||
Type of data set | Partly terminated system | ||||||||||||||||||||
LCI Method Principle | Attributional | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deviation from LCI method principle / explanations | None | ||||||||||||||||||||
LCI method approaches |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Deviations from LCI method approaches / explanations | No multi-product problems are identified in the foreground system. In the background system, multi-product datasets are converted to single-product datasets with the help of database wide modelling rules, by partitioning. After the handling of wastes and recyclable materials, allocation takes place over all remaining products produced within the activity. By default, it allocates exchanges from multi-output processes according to their revenue. In the foreground system, circular-footprint formula (CFF) approach is applied; the systems does not contain end-of-life co-product or secondary material input in the foreground. The background data uses EF compliant datasets when available, with respective implementation of the CFF approach. When no EF complaint dataset is available, the background is modelled with use of the datasets based on the “Recycled content cut-off” approach to allocate end-of-life by-products and secondary materials. This allocation is explained in the description of the recycled content system model (http://www.ecoinvent.org/database/system-models-in-ecoinvent-3/cut-off-system-model/allocation-cut-off-by-classification.html). | ||||||||||||||||||||
Modelling constants | Direct Land Use change: Land use is inventorised through the use of data on: • Land occupation for the current land use (the occupied land is prevented from changing to a more natural state). • Land transformation (from previous land use and to current land use, e.g., the conversion of a former natural area to industrial land; the conversion of a gravel quarry to a natural area by active re-cultivation). Direct land use change is accounted for on the basis of a 20 year time period and implemented in the calculation of Climate Change according to the PAS2050-1:2012 method and Land Use. It should be noted that the land use classes are not intended to capture specific emissions, such as the CO2 emissions after forest clearing. Such emissions are therefore separately included in the datasets for the specific crops that are grown on such recently transformed land. Carbon storage and delayed emissions: All emissions are considered and therefore no credits are given. Emissions off-setting: No offsets are considered. Time period: No time discounting is reported. Emissions and removals are modelled as if released or removed at the beginning of the assessment method. GHG Emission fossil: All GHG emissions from fossil fuels (including peat and limestone) are modelled consistently with the most updated EF list of elementary flows on the foreground and ILCD list of elementary flows on the background. Carbon emissions and uptakes (biogenic): A distinction is made between fossil and non-fossil sources of CO2, CO and CH4. The sources of fossil carbon are the resource inputs of fossil fuels, peat, and mineral carbonates . The resource consumption of “Carbon dioxide, in air” is calculated from the carbon in harvested plants and wild animals and increases in carbon stored in soils and plants. The latter is recorded as an output of “Carbon dioxide, to soil or biomass stock”. “Carbon dioxide, in air” is the only source of non-fossil carbon, which is mainly captured through the biological photosynthesis. Carbon emissions – land use and land use change: Reductions in the carbon stored in soils and the release of carbon from the burning of biomass residues in connection to land transformation, e.g. the clear-cutting of primary forests, are recorded in the elementary exchange (resource) “Carbon, organic, in soil or biomass stock”. No land use and land use change is modelled in the foreground systems. Capital goods (including infrastructures) and their End of Life: The activity datasets for production infrastructure are included in the averaged background datasets, effectively accounting for the infrastructure. The activity datasets include the maintenance of the infrastructure during its lifetime, its land occupation and land transformation, and its decommissioning for waste treatment. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deviation from modelling constants / explanations | Carbon emissions – land use and transformation in the backgrounds: Reductions in the carbon stored in soils and the release of carbon from the burning of biomass residues in connection to land transformation, e.g. the clear-cutting of primary forests, are recorded in the elementary exchange (resource) “Carbon, organic, in soil or biomass stock”. All of this input is included in the corresponding emissions of Carbon dioxide, Carbon monoxide, and Methane, all with the addition “…, from soil or biomass stock”, and therefore does not contribute to any carbon content of any intermediate exchanges (Overview and methodology Ecoinvent. Section 5.6.2 Fossil and non-fossil carbon). | ||||||||||||||||||||
Data sources, treatment and representativeness | |||||||||||||||||||||
Data cut-off and completeness principles | Cut-offs: LCI modelling has been done based on literature sources, theoretical models and by adapting available data sets from databases. When modelling production of chemicals, a number of general assumptions have been used together with stoichiometric calculations. The background models include impacts of infrastructure, yield, heat and electricity and water. At primary level, datasets are as complete as the sources allow, with no cut-off applied. Capital goods (including infrastructures) and their End of Life: The activity datasets for production infrastructure are included in the averaged background datasets, effectively accounting for the infrastructure. The activity datasets include the maintenance of the infrastructure during its lifetime, its land occupation and land transformation, and its decommissioning for waste treatment. System boundaries: System boundaries include all processes linked to the product supply chain, i.e. extraction, production, transport, consumption and waste treatment activities. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deviation from data cut-off and completeness principles / explanations | No strict quantitative cut-off rule is followed in the background sources. No predefined, limited list of elementary exchanges is applied. Full completeness in elementary exchanges is aimed for. The cut-off rule threshold of 95% is satisfied. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Data selection and combination principles | Data is consistently based on literature sources, theoretical models and adapted datasets from databases. The relevant background data is sourced from EF3.0 core databases and EF3.0 for chemicals. When processes in these databases were not available, ecoinvent v3.3 database was used (www.ecoinvent.org). | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deviation from data selection and combination principles / explanations | None | ||||||||||||||||||||
Data treatment and extrapolations principles | No adjustments and extrapolations are performed at primary level. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deviation from data treatment and extrapolations principles / explanations | None | ||||||||||||||||||||
Data source(s) used for this data set | |||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage supply or production covered | 0 % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Completeness | |||||||||||||||||||||
Completeness of product model | All relevant flows quantified | ||||||||||||||||||||
Supported impact assessment methods |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Completeness elementary flows, per topic |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Validation | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Compliance Declarations |
Compliance |
Compliance system name
|
Approval of overall compliance
Fully compliant |
Nomenclature compliance
Fully compliant |
Methodological compliance
Fully compliant |
Review compliance
Fully compliant |
Documentation compliance
Fully compliant |
Quality compliance
Not defined |
Compliance |
Compliance system name
|
Approval of overall compliance
Fully compliant |
Nomenclature compliance
Fully compliant |
Methodological compliance
Fully compliant |
Review compliance
Fully compliant |
Documentation compliance
Fully compliant |
Quality compliance
Fully compliant |
Compliance |
Compliance system name
|
Approval of overall compliance
Fully compliant |
Nomenclature compliance
Not defined |
Methodological compliance
Fully compliant |
Review compliance
Fully compliant |
Documentation compliance
Not defined |
Quality compliance
Not defined |
Compliance |
Compliance system name
|
Approval of overall compliance
Fully compliant |
Nomenclature compliance
Not defined |
Methodological compliance
Fully compliant |
Review compliance
Not defined |
Documentation compliance
Fully compliant |
Quality compliance
Not defined |
Compliance |
Compliance system name
|
Approval of overall compliance
Not defined |
Nomenclature compliance
Fully compliant |
Methodological compliance
Not defined |
Review compliance
Not defined |
Documentation compliance
Not defined |
Quality compliance
Not defined |
Commissioner and goal | |
Commissioner of data set | |
Project | Provision of "Chemicals for paints" process-based product environmental footprint-compliant life cycle inventory datasets. Contract number: 070201/2019/819371/SER/ENV.B.l. |
Intended applications | To be used in the implementation of a regular Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) studies and Organisation Environmental Footprint (OEF) studies exclusively under the specified Product groups and sectors as defined in the Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) and Organisation Environmental Footprint Sectorial Rules (OEFSR) listed in http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/PEFCR_OEFSR.htm and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the EULA exclusively until 31st December 2024. |
Data generator | |
Data set generator / modeller | |
Data entry by | |
Time stamp (last saved) | 2022-11-21T07:21:37.812+01:00 |
Data set format(s) | |
Data entry by | |
Publication and ownership | |
UUID | 9ed70d04-2dbe-45c9-9da0-3cf7d5734cf7 |
Date of last revision | 2022-01-28T07:59:32+01:00 |
Data set version | 03.01.000 |
Preceding Data set version | |
Workflow and publication status | Data set finalised; entirely published |
Owner of data set | |
Copyright | Yes |
Reference to entities with exclusive access | |
License type | Free of charge for some user types or use types |
Access and use restrictions | To be used for the implementation of regular Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) studies and Organisation Environmental Footprint (OEF) studies exclusively under the specified Product groups and sectors as defined in the Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCR) and Organisation Environmental Footprint Sectorial Rules (OEFSR) listed in http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/smgp/PEFCR_OEFSR.htm and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the EULA (available at https://lcdn-cepe.org/) exclusively until 31st December 2024. Any use of this dataset or any derivative data not within the specific context of one of the PEF/OEF projects or after the end of 2024 is not permitted. |
Inputs
Type of flow | Classification | Flow | Location | Mean amount | Resulting amount | Minimum amount | Maximum amount |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product flow | Other Services / Other services | 1.0 kg | 1.0 kg | ||||
Product flow | Other Services / Other services | 1.0 kg | 1.0 kg | ||||
Product flow | 0.0 kg | 0.0 kg | |||||
Product flow | 0.05420000000000016 kg | 0.05420000000000016 kg | |||||
Product flow | 0.0 kg | 0.0 kg | |||||
Product flow | 0.01 kg | 0.01 kg | |||||
Product flow | 0.1477 kg | 0.1477 kg | |||||
Product flow | 0.416 kg | 0.416 kg |
Outputs
Type of flow | Classification | Flow | Location | Mean amount | Resulting amount | Minimum amount | Maximum amount |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product flow | ILCD / Materials production / Organic chemicals | 1.0 kg | 1.0 kg |
LCIA Method Data set | Mean amount | Unit | Kommentar |
---|---|---|---|
0.01474529496055539
| mol H+ equivalents | ||
2.6218522633220647
| kg CO2 Equivalents | ||
2.328001677317E-7
| disease incidence | ||
19.52777712805387
| CTUe | ||
0.01081819996246
| kg N equivalents | ||
3.775736983986E-4
| kg P equivalents | ||
0.03935657044664
| mol N equivalents | ||
3.734296288604552E-9
| CTUh | ||
3.019641083326612E-8
| CTUh | ||
0.06617186177836
| kBq U235 equivalents | ||
202.7001937528
| dimensionless (pt) | ||
7.666453877745E-8
| kg CFC11 equivalents | ||
0.012782688389087749
| kg NMVOC equivalents | ||
50.55933613727
| MJ | ||
9.825082674388E-6
| kg Sb equivalents | ||
0.7351760806683
| m3-world equivalents |